Social Networks and Blogging: The Chasms and Bridges · 05/27/2007

What’s the difference between a social network and blogs or a blogging service? One is for your friends, the other is for your audience. The key difference is that one group already knows you(it’s easy to replace “friends” with “coworkers”, “family”, “neighbors”, etc). Pure social networking services like hi5 and Reunion.com are made for connecting with your friends, family, and miscellaneous contacts. Pure blogging services like TypePad and Wordpress.com are for publishing content that’s available to anyone. But either service can be connected to anything on the Internet, because the true “killer-app” of the web, the hyperlink, lets me send people to my profile page or my latest entry, so long as what I’m linking to is publicly available.

Different Reasons Put Chasms Between Them


Blogging is all about sharing your ideas, pictures, analysis, jokes, links, or even your life with anyone who wants to view it. From the best bloggers, it’s an in-depth, high-quality, frequent experience. Or at least two of the three. Blogging can be used to reach many people at once. You’re sending content out into the world, and when you speak it’s not just to one person, but to everyone reading. You can have conversations, like Kent Newsome and I just had, but they’re open conversations so that they benefit our audience as well as ourselves.

Social networking, on the other hand, is all about connecting with people you know or want to get to know. It’s a casual, no-pressure, as-you-can experience. It’s a many-to-many experience rather than one-to-many. Each person’s profile is a piece in a greater picture, and most social networks add extra dimensions to this picture by adding smaller spheres within it in the form of “groups” you can join. Conversation on social networking services are one-to-one through messaging a friend, or many-to-many by through forums and group chats.

The Power of Aggregation


Let’s say your high school class has 200 people in it. You’re friends with 50 of them, good friends with 10. From your college classes, you got to know about 400 people, 100 of them you really likes, and 20 of them became close friends. You’ve been through a few jobs, had maybe 50 coworkers you liked, 5 of them you’d actually hang out with on a regular basis. From those three groups alone, you have 200 people you have positive, if casual, relationships with, and 35 people you’d identify as a close contact. For most people, that’s too many to keep up an in-depth relationship with. Social networking services let you at least maintain a casual relationship by making it easy to get an overview of any person at any time. Facebook has taken it a step further with their News Feed by letting everyone see individual changes each of their friends have made(subject to privacy settings), eliminating redundantly checking profiles for new information.

Blogging benefits from aggregation as well. RSS feeds bring the content we’re most interested in to one place, as it’s published. While you miss out on the presentational aspects of each blog(like my beautiful sandy-blue design) it takes away the effort of checking 35 different sites only to find 5 of them have updated. De-centralization is excellent for personalization and uniqueness, and serves those with strong ties well. But centralization is essential for convenience and maintenance of weak ties.

Bridges Between Blogs


I used the term “pure” services in my first paragraph because not all suffer from the chasms mentioned above, although the most innovative of these have the unfortunate reputation of not being “serious” tools. The professional software most often used for high-traffic blogs like Movable Type, Wordpress, or the excellent Textpattern are all made to create a stand-alone blog, unconnected to a central service or community. TypePad and Wordpress.com, as mentioned above, are the hosted versions of these tools, yet still are made for stand-alone sites. But before any of these tools came out, LiveJournal was building blogs and communities. The “Friends Page” lists all recent entries of users whose username you’ve added as a friend. It was the first blog aggregator, and it did so in a way much more similar to present-day social networking services than RSS readers.

Every Medium Has a Purpose


In what I hope will emerge as a frequent theme of this blog, new mediums rarely make old mediums invalid. Communications tools are many and varying in capabilities because communication itself has no single form or purpose. You don’t have to believe me, look to the market for proof. Six Apart, the makers of Movable Type, acquired LiveJournal because they recognize the strengths of both types of tools. They’ve since launched Vox, a service that further blurs the lines between social networking service and blogging service. Google now owns Blogger, but they also maintain Orkut, a site so highly used in Brazil that it had 11 out of 12 million Brazilian home-internet users had an account in 2006.

To blog or to network? Why not both?

Social Strategist

---

Commenting is closed for this article.


Previous Article:

Next Article:
Portrait of Jay Neely

About Jay Neely

Jay Neely is a Boston entrepreneur interested in online strategy, user experience, and emerging technologies.
More About Jay...

Consulting

I'm currently available for short term web strategy consulting projects.
Web Strategy Consulting...

Contact Jay

E-mail: jay [=dot=] neely [=at=] socialstrategist [=dot=] com

An image of my e-mail address, written above.

Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS / Subscribe via Atom ?

Subscribe via E-mail ?

Read More

Find:

Blogroll

Melissa Sconyers

Andrew Rollins

Young Go Getter

Shimon Rura

More...


Powered By...

Creative Commons License Powered by TextPattern

Green Web Hosting! This site hosted by DreamHost. Innovation Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory